For the Common Good-The Ethics of Leadership in the 21st Century is an edited compilation of works, which serves to provide evidence that a stronger ethical leadership approach is necessary for properly managing the globalizing world of the 21st Century. This book proposes that there are 7 critical drivers, within the context of the volatile realities of modern globalization, that can be assessed in order to predict both threats and opportunities facing 21st century leaders. Knapp (2007) includes reviews of historically successful leadership strategies used by well-respected figures, such as Mohandus Gandhi and Peter Drucker, that can offer valuable application for future leaders’ approaches to strategic management, organization and prioritization, and business plan implementation regarding these global challenges. Universities are targeted as the primary entity responsible for preparing our future leaders with proper ethics training in infusing tactics, like collaborative decision making, to address hunger, environmental degradation and world conflict to promote the common good.
Knapp (2007) divides his book into three primary sections, from which I will review key concepts and highlight chapters that characterize ethical leadership as a means to achieve universally positive global outcomes. Each chapter discusses background on the issue, provides insightful examples, and creates recommended strategies from various forward-thinking authors.
Section 1: New Climate for Leadership
This section explores how proposed global drivers have been ineffectively addressed through modern leadership assumptions, ultimately resulting in lack of trust in business and deficient models for future leaders to follow. The call for increased ethical understanding and practice by future leadership is made, and evidence, including the well-respected work of Peter Drucker, is included in an analysis that yields recommendations for emotionally intelligent leadership thought stricter compliance with corporate mission, values, transparent performance in business and the social sector, social and self awareness, and venture philanthropy.
ChApTeR 1, “Scanning more distant horizons.” Erik Peterson discusses how political and business pressures have prevented modern leaders from being able to look forward. He explains that innovation and change in leadership is needed to proactively influence the forces shaping our world. Peterson proposes that organized thinking and action can result from examination of opportunities and threats within the seven key drivers of global change.
|
ChApTeR 4, “Peter Drucker’s Light: Illuminating the Path for 21st Century Leaders.” Frances Hesselbein focuses on Peter Drucker’s work in studying the importance of the social sector as the most successful tool for meeting the most social needs. Hesselbein reinforces Drucker’s strategies for helping businesses understand and act in accordance with their business mission and vision. Hesselbein recalls Drucker’s unwavering beliefs that maintaining the community is the responsibility of the corporation, whereby they must be accountable for institutional performance and must cross-collaborate to form a common corporate vision of a healthy community.
|
Section2: Leadership challenges in the global context
This section recommends reviewing historical challenges, such as that faced by Gandhi or the European Union, to obtain wisdom for turning high priority modern global challenges (environmental degradation, world hunger, etc.) into opportunities to protect survival. These “new” business leadership strategies include respect for differences, E Pluribus Unum (unification for a common interest), conflict resolution, shared visions, and establishing a culture of non-violence through practicing humility. Authors in this section provide examples of how redefining business success to include long term thinking, sustainability, and leading by example (such as the new environmental sustainability plan at Interface) are able to simultaneously meet the triple bottom line of Corporate Social Responsibility (“doing well by doing good and doing good by doing well”) and the financial bottom line.
|
ChApTeR 8, “Problems of Hunger and the Global Response.” This chapter reviews trends in the growing global population without a growing food supply. This is attributed, in part, to lack of arable land in populated areas, lack of infrastructure in developing countries, and natural resource degradation. Author E.T. York proposes that challenges to the global food supply facilitate the need for research on ways to sustain agricultural production systems, including bioengineering to compliment effective existing techniques. York also discusses the importance of new leaders to address food access, as incomes among the poor are not sufficient to afford available food, such is the case in Sub-saharan Africa. The author discusses the primary ethical dispute and moral challenge facing the leaders of the 21st Century: helping the hungry and the poor:
Con Argument
• Alleviating hunger may actually do more harm than good long term:
• Will reduce death rate, increasing population, further increasing food demand
• Allowing population growth in poor countries to exceed that of affluent countries will result in more hunger problems
• Higher population growth in marginal areas will lead to further environmental degradation
•Donating food will negatively impact domestic markets by causing local vendors to decrease prices/revenue due to competition. Decreased incentives for output will decrease food access.
•Hunger is morally acceptable, because survival of the fittest is a law of nature
•Donated aid often does not reach intended recipients or find its way to the neediest people
Pro Argument
• Children are the most vulnerable to hunger problems, globally leading to 250,000 deaths/week. The amount of money spent of cigarette ads, alone, could prevent malnutrition-related diseases and death
• Charity to the poor is a tenant of all major religions/cultural ethical values
• Hunger is morally unacceptable because pain experienced by the hungry exceeds the pleasure of those well-fed
• Ignoring world hunger is morally wrong, like letting a child drown because it is inconvenient to save him.
• Western nations are obligated to help because they have benefited from conditions that contributed to world hunger
• Targeted aid helps economies, increasing number of people who can afford food
• Reducing hunger and poverty helps control population because families need fewer children to financially support aging family members
The average American can name 1000 corporate brands, but can only name 10 types of plants (Knapp, 2007).
Section 3: The Promise of Higher Education
This section exposes concerns of the academic and ethical underperformance of today’s students. The authors in this section suggest that universities are in the best position to prepare tomorrow’s leaders to be ethical in decision making and effectively collaborative with stakeholders/in public interest and in managing resources across decentralized operations. In order for universities to be considered qualified to impact the ethical leadership in global society, the authors recommend that universities demonstrate priorities through ethical messages prioritizing academics over athletics, as well as competencies in teaching, scholarship, research, and service.
ChApTeR 11, “Global Ethical Leadership and Higher Education: “Being the Change You Wish to See.” This chapter defines 21st Century leaders as ethically grounded individuals who are committed to the common good of humanity with the ability to harness new spirituality that has the potential to unify humanity (Knapp, 2007). Author Lawrence Edward Carter Sr. looks back to two university presidents of the early 20th century as role models for ethical behaviors in higher education, such as convictions the vision of enhancing the educational system, ability to debate, and deep understanding of educational problems, democracy and freedom. Carter Sr. also goes on to identify responsibilities for the university in cultivating new ethical leaders. It is recommended that universities focus on developing the methods and tools for critically engaging students in social issues, skills for non-violent productive conflict resolution, commitment to ethical leadership, and strategies exploring individual meaning for a just global society. Ultimately, with ethical preparation, these authors indicate that the leaders of tomorrow can, in fact, be the change.
What makes you a good leader? Through the Good Work Project, developmental psychologists examine and promote ethical leader cultivation. Check it out at http://www.goodworkproject.org .
Here’s a brief intro discussing the origins of ethical leaders
------------------
Reflection: I think that this book helpfully encourages critical thinking about what we can do to benefit society and how, through leadership, we can achieve that benefit. How can you “BE THE CHANGE” that you think is needed? In an MBA program, we all wish to be effective leaders on some capacity. Join religious and secular collaboration on the exploration of human passion to benefit the common good at http://www.whatsyourcalling.org
Here's a video illustrating people's passion for the common good.
Connections with Class: The readings from this semester were helpful in preparing me to better understand the scope and purpose of this book. I think that For the Common Good and Pope Benedict XVI’s “Caritas in Veritate” share the same mission in promoting corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership (charity and justice) to protect the global society and the environment. The book’s discussion of Peter Drucker’s work with promoting corporate collaboration to achieve social responsibility, with maintenance of a strong mission and vision, relates to our learning of the minimum requirements of a strong ethics program discussed by Ferrell, Fraedrich, and Ferrell (2011). Ferrell, Fraedrich, and Ferrell (2011) also discuss various philosophies with which people view the world and themselves, and make their decisions. Knapp (2007) suggests that future leaders transcend utilitarianism, cultural relativism, and religion, looking for deeper meanings that are common to, and for the good of, all people.
Additional Questions for Discussion:
1. As a current and/or future leader, can you think of examples of how Peter Drucker’s concept of “seeing what’s visible, but not yet seen” could be applied current/future global issues?
2. Do you tend to side with being “for” or “against” getting involved with global hunger and why do you choose this position?
References
Ferrell, O.C., Fraedrich, J., and Ferrell, L.(2011). Business ethics: Ethical decision
making and cases. Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage Learning
Knapp, J.C. (Ed.). (2007). For the common good: The ethics of leadership in the
21st century. Westport, CT: Praeger Pulbishers
Pope Benedict XVI. (2009). Caritas in veritate. Retrieved from:
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/
fh_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html
Hello Everyone,
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by to check out my book review. Sorry if you have already checked here for it and didn't see it. I have been having problems all semester with blogspot. Anyhow, 3 computers and 21 hours later, here is my book review. I look forward hearing your thoughts!
Thanks!
Rachel,
ReplyDeleteYou did an excellent job on the book synopsis. One of the topics that stood out to me was that of the global food supply and hunger dilemma. Millions of dollars are wasted on expensive ad campaigns while millions of people are starving. I think the pro or con decision depends on an individual’s values and beliefs as well as influences and status. No single moral philosophy is shared by everyone. Those who have money may have adopted a moral philosophy perspective similar to an egoist. On the other hand, your average Joe may believe that everyone should be treated equally and that it is more ethical to feed the hungry. This also has to deal with the intensity of the ethical issue, or how relevant the issue is to the individual. I am on the fence on this one – most people I know have enough money to live comfortably, and could donate a few extra dollars to help those in need. However, I would probably think differently if I grew up without shoes or a bathroom. Also, there is a part of me that believes some individual’s are starving as a consequence of their actions.
“Seeing what’s visible, but not yet seen” means looking into the future and setting a vision of what you desire your company to be. It is not predicting the future; it is a goal that is already there, but you are required to carry it out. Peter Drucker also warns that not seeing the unseen can let the competition get ahead and put your organization in the dust. Making appropriate ethical decisions is necessary to achieve and hang onto success. Each organization’s culture is unique and plays a big role in ethical decision making. A strong transformational leadership style can ensure employee commitment to an ethical corporate culture. The more organizations that adopt these philosophies, the closer we work as a community to achieve the common good.
Hi Rachel,
ReplyDeleteI had problems with my blog too. You did such a nice job on the blog and great review of your book.
Some examples I can think of examples of Peter Drucker's concept of seeing what is visible and not yet seen include solutions to problems created that have tremendous expense on revenue and human life like the increasing number of wheather related disasters; an agent/method to put out wildfires in the west, an agent/method that absorbs many times it's own weight to lesson the impact of flooding.
This concept requires the vision and strategic planning that makes great leaders. We need more people and ideas like this in America so we can stay competitive globally and work toward the common good.
I am torn on the subject of global hunger. Of course, I hate to see any suffering. But in my own experience I find that people receiving food assistance don't use in the way that they are supposed to (for food.) You may have seen the brief report on the news about people receiving this assistance to use the money to take luxurious trips.
As for very poor countries, I do believe stronger countries who are able are obligated to help with at least basic things like water but I don't think these countries should help in excess because they all have their own national problems. I think it would be great if we could somehow figure a way to educated the poor about birth control and/or make them realized that these children will not have a good life.
I believe that the greed of humans is robbing the earth of all its resources and we must find a way to stop before there is nothing left.
Hello Rachel,
ReplyDeleteGreat Job! with your post and review.
Global hunger issues can be addressed through collaboration between food companies and hunger mission agencies and governments to design a program of giving whereby donations can be given by corporations and maybe even a volunteer system where those being feed can volunteer labor to help feed the hungry in their communities/countries.
I am Pro for getting involved with world hunger. I feel that the world has enough resources to feed every human alive. It is a matter of redirecting resources and getting food to those who do not have the resources or physical ability to grow or breed their own food. Everyone should have a right to eat....
Cheryl Harris
Hello Rachel,
ReplyDeleteExcellent Job! I especially liked how you highlighted important words all through your blog post.
1) I think your first question is sort of about trends. I see a trend towards voluntary simplicity or minimalism. It's visible and growing but generally it's not seen. Environmental destruction is also like that. You have to go where the destruction is taking place to see it happening. With the environment, some of the effects of destruction are beginning to be visible, but people are not seeing them mostly because the changes are subtle or because we don't spend enough time outside to notice.
2) I believe that hunger is political issue more than it is an issue of food availability. Every year more than enough food is grown to feed every person. However, our economic systems are not setup correctly. Food is a privilege for those that can buy it when it should be a right (especially for children who are hungry through no fault of their own).
I forgot to mention how much I liked the second video and your reflection on being the change!
ReplyDeleteHi Jamie,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your feedback, and I enjoyed your insightful discussion about the ethical positions related to global hunger. Previously, I hadn't thought much about the con side to this dilemma. However, I agree with you that I am not in support of helping starving people, if they have the opportunity to help themselves, but don't. I think this is such a complicated issue, though, and it would be hard to determine who deserves help and who doesn't, as well as what the appropriate ethical approach would be. As a nutrition professional, I am inclined to focus on the ethics related to food access, food safety, and basic essential nutrient requirements. One thing that I think is difficult to argue with is that children need proper nutrition to become productive and healthy adults. While I have concerns about the SNAP (food stamp) program in the US, I think that WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) is a wonderful program that is accountable and is under very strict governmental regulations. This program has shown evidence of providing beneficial outcomes (more info at: http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/aboutwic/howwichelps.htm#diet%20outcomes) I believe that this program could be a model for governments in other countries, as well.
"For the Common Good" poses that the key to global hunger is helping countries to become self-reliant, not necessarily self-sufficient. Self-reliancy encourages the food sustainabilility of a country through domestic food production and production of exports to cover the food deficit cost (imports).
I think that this position makes a lot of sense, but will take a lot of international collaboration of organizations, particularly with strong and non-corrupt government leadership.
As you mentioned, people may be inclined to involve themselves with the global hunger based on their own beliefs and status. I believe that a valuable lesson from "For the Common Good" is that we all have to eat, and we all share the same environment...the call is to see the bigger picture: everyone has a role in determining his/her responsibility for creating a productive and sustainable global food supply.
Thanks! :)
Hi Colleen,
ReplyDeleteSorry to hear that you have had problems with your blogging, too! Thanks for sharing, though, it makes me feel better :)
I think you have provided some good examples illustrating Peter Drucker's point about how ethical leaders are able to intuitively examine the environment around them and apply strategic thinking and implementation. As you mentioned, though we cannnot predict natural disasters, the proactive approaches to enhance safety measures could be of benefit to everyone. I think that this can benefit both companies (protecting survival and/or gaining competitive advantage) and individuals (getting needs met and obtaining value through protection of life and physical assets).
I think you, also, bring up some good points about the ethics of global hunger: accountability, education, prevention, protection of children, greed, and global environment.
Thanks for your thoughts!!!
Hi Cheryl,
ReplyDeleteThank you, I appreciate your kind response! I think that you have touched on the essence of the issue: everyone has a right to eat. I wonder if anyone would disagree with this statement? I think that this can transpire thoughts about how the bottom line of corporations may have disrupted this right (loss of arable land to buildings, pollutant contamination of food and water supplies, etc.). In essence, then, the reversal of this process does put ethical responsibility back on corporations.
I think you also bring up a great point about the physical lack of resources and arable land...some countries have a lot of area where, currently, we just don't know how to make food grow from it. Redistribution of the food supply makes sense from many different standpoints, however, it requires trust to import, efficiency, and safety measures.
I think it was last week, that Karmen shared her book review about the ethics of biotechnology, and our class offered a lot of good discussion about ethical and other implications. "For the Common Good" discusses how research and biotechnology offers the world the ability to efficiently resolve global hunger, but modern society has been unable to overcome the ethical challenges of using this knowledge and ability to take action.
Thanks, again, for your thoughtful post! :0)
Hi Jim,
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for the positive comments, and I value your responses!
I interpreted Drucker's words and ideas in much the same way you explain them. I think that the essence of being an enlightened ethical leader starts with a person's ability to be in-tune with trends (no matter how subtle) and the surrounding environment, and harness that knowledge as a basis for problem solving. I think that you provided some awesome examples of how this can apply in the real world! It certainly seems that there are some companies that could be considered ethical leaders by Drucker's standards (green technologies in business, waste minimization, etc.).
Great point about the political and economical disruption of the food supply. To bring the discussion back to national hunger, as an example of your point, there are still hungry people in the US, because even though there is enough food produced, not everyone can afford sufficient food. In addition to that issue, we have the problem of low cost foods overfeeding kids, but undernourishing them. At least a seemingly responsible action has been taken, with the Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act of 2010 (more info at: http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Governance/Legislation/CNR_2010.htm). I remember that this legislation was supported by many organizations (including the American Dietetic Association) and had little opposition in the House and Senate.
I am glad that you liked the second video. I have to say, I felt inspired by the phrases "be the change" and "become the change." I feel like we face so many challenges in life, it is exciting to think that this three word motto has the potential to make the world a better place. :)
Hi Rachel,
ReplyDeleteI had a lot of problems with my blog too. You did a very comprehensive book review. It was very interesting. Ghandi’s comment about cleaning toilets while understandable is quite a challenge. I think it would be hard to find people who would be have the same zeal in both jobs.
Peter Drucker’s seeing what is visible but yet unseen concept could be applied in today and future global issues. A company is destined for failure if it doesn’t look towards the future and predict what the future market or trends may be for its industry. To remain competitive a business has to do this. A good example of this is Google. They are constantly developing new ideas and anticipating their customer’s needs in advance in order to give them what they want before they even know they want it.
We definitely need to be involved in the fight against hunger. My first reason is my personal belief in the bible. God says to leave the outer crops in the field for the poor so they have food. Part of being ethical is sharing what we have with others and working towards the common good as the Pope wrote in his encyclical. It’s easy to forget about the hungry when we live in a country that has so much food that many of us over indulge. I think if we lived or worked side by side with persons who were starving and saw real starvation, we wouldn’t hesitate to fight for this cause. Although, I’ve never been to a country personally and saw first hand real poverty, I have seen videos and heard people’s testimony that have. Mothers and fathers beg you to take one of their children home with you so it doesn’t starve to death or die from disease. They have to walk for miles and are thrilled when they find a mud puddle with some water in it that is unsafe to drink (and they do drink it). Everyone deserves to have clean drinking water and a meal every day and with all the abundance that some many of us have, it is clear that we need to share our blessing.
Great questions. Thanks Rachel.
Hello Again,
ReplyDeleteSpeaking on the issue of world hunger. What happened to the programs in the United States whereby farmers were being paid by the government to not grow food? It seems to me that now they ought to be paying farmers to grow food. With all the alternative fuel sources that can use food sources it would be a good idea to increase the growth of food like corn.
Now there is a shortage of corn in the world because of the many uses and not enough growing coupled with the natural disasters like floods wiping out crops.
Hunger must now compete with alternative fuel sources for the world's resources.
Cheryl Harris
Hello Rachel, great book blog. I can see that you put much effort into your blog, and it was great to read. I have also been having major issues with blogspot, so I understand where you are coming from :)
ReplyDelete1. I believe that "seeing what’s visible, but not yet seen” is very important for companies if they want to be successful in the long run. This involves strategic planning, and taking into account business trends. A company needs to set a vision that is both realistic, and innovative to survive.
2. I am absolutly for helping the global hunger cause. If there is a chance that I can help others, either in terms of my time or money, that I would be honored to do so. We have all been through tough times, or will go through tough times in the future. Looking at recent global events involing unforseen events such as earthquakes or tornados for examples. I will always be so thankful for those who helped me in my toughest times, and would be honored to return the favor. Luckily today we have a variety of options to support others. Charities have to mentioned how much of their proceeds go to the cause, or what they do with their funds. Furthermore, you can even look at nonprofits information from your local library. Even little methods like buying organic, or not buying from products that are not producive to countries with starving citizens can help. With the variety of options, there is a way in which anyone can help out, in a way in which they feel comfortable.
FROM MATT A
ReplyDelete1.As a current and/or future leader, can you think of examples of how Peter Drucker’s concept of “seeing what’s visible, but not yet seen” could be applied current/future global issues?
Hi it’s Matt A. I agree with the author of section 3 that universities are in the best position to prepare tomorrow’s leaders to be ethical in decision making. Universities lack the profit motive that creating the opportunity for unethical behavior which makes universities the perfect place to instill the foundations of business ethics. That is what is visible, what is not yet seen are universities taking a leadership role in making ethics a core of all curriculums. According to some research, it is up to the professors to teach ethics and it is no apart of the curriculum. I feel the lack of ethics training is a current global issue and universities can be a leader in correcting it. See academic journal: http://businesscommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/06ABC03.pdf of more information.
2.Do you tend to side with being “for” or “against” getting involved with global hunger and why do you choose this position?
I am for getting involved with global hunger when it is easy to do so. I will donate, but, I doubt that I will board a plane with foodstuffs and travel the world delivering food to the hungry. Poverty and political issues are the main causes of hunger in the world and those must be addressed before the hunger issue can be solved. Read a great article of hunger and poverty at:http://www.globalissues.org/issue/6/world-hunger-and-poverty
Hi Connie,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your response! Great example of how Google has been able to truly observe its customers to "see what's visible" and use that information to advance their technology and anticipate "what's not yet seen" to determine how bring more value to more people! I remember reading in this week's class discussion board,that someone had paralleled Google and Stonyfield related to their strong corporate ethics approaches. I thought that this was a good connection. Stonyfield has been on a mission to protect the environment since the 1980's, before I think it was truly understood that strong corporate ethics could translate into corporate competitive advantage.
Also, I think that you have brought up some good points in discussing the challenges to effectively working toward a common good. People can be limited to act if they do not feel that they understand an issue, or if they feel they are not affected by it. They may also not feel motivated to act if they think there is something else more important that they should be doing or that it's someone else's job to do. Ultimately, this book serves to remind us of the value of humility and personal responsibility as important characteristics of effective ethical leadership.
Hi Cheryl,
ReplyDeleteI agree, it's very disheartening to think about the outcomes of ineffective approaches and poor decisions made related to the food supply, fuel, and protection of our natural resources.
In the argument of food versus fuel, it's easy to see how it will be difficult to get people to agree. Using food for fuel, increases the risk that food prices will increase. I believe that its possible to create a solution that works on both combating world hunger and creating more effective biofuels. I was reading a paper by a Canadian college student, G. Saket, who discusses some of the primary concerns and positions related to this issue (http://www.uoguelph.ca/plant/courses/plnt-6250/pdf/G_Samii-Saket.pdf). What I found interesting was the potential that lies in second generation biofuels, which use the non-edible portion of food wastes and algae to produce fuels. As such, more efficient food production could help to meet the demands of a growing population, and its waste could be used to meet the demands of the biofuel industry. Of course, it will take ethical leaders to help get us there!
Great points, thanks!
Hi Amy,
ReplyDeleteI agree that Peter Drucker was discussing the importance of seeing business from the long view. It is important for the leader's of today and tomorrow to be able to develop an understanding of trends and sharpen their skills to discern what is important and what is going to be important.
It was nice to read about your position on global hunger. It made me think of the value of "the golden rule" and "karma"...things that I think have previously helped contribute to my understanding of morals and guidance for constituting an ethical framework.
Also, thanks for providing examples of how an individual can realistically get involved in playing a role in benefiting the greater good through their self-education and everyday choices. :)
Hi Rachel! Nice blog. I totally understand the technical issues, I've had a few myself and personally get frustrated when the technology takes up more time and energy than the learning...what a waste!
ReplyDeleteI think Drucker is correct in that we need to see what is coming before it comes. John Kotter wrote many great books about leadership, but a pertinent one to this topic is Our Iceberg Is Melting and in it he talks about not allowing yourself to be lulled into success and getting too comfortable and instead looking for the early clues and taking action before it is a problem. You have to develop strategies and embrace innovation or you will not continue to succeed. If you wait for the problems to come, you won't be prepared and will lost valuable time.
While I certainly see world hunger as a problem, I see it as cultural, political and/or religious problems more than a food supply problem. Often times in foreign countries, donated food can go to waste because the governments aren't motivated or organized to distribute it. I'm a big believer in teaching to fish rather than giving the fish. I am a supporter of education, seed loans, micro-loans and programs that give people long term independence, particularly for woman. If a woman can control the size of her family, earn a living wage and not be dependent on a man, she is less likely to be poor or be infected with a disease such as AIDS that creates poverty. This empowers people. If you want to help them in a long-term significant way, give them opportunity and birth control so that they can begin to solve their own problems much like we did in our own country. When they are empowered, they will take their own country back from corruption or incompetent leaders.
That said, I am not against feeding people, I just don't think it is a long-term solution because it creates enabling. Many of the problems of hunger can't be solved unless the roots (lack of opportunity & education, cultural issues and religious beliefs) of the problems are solved.
Hi Matt,
ReplyDeletethanks for your information and discussion! :)
I agree that universities seem uniquely positioned to be a leader in teaching ethics and cultivating ethical leaders. Thanks for the link to the qualitative study about ethics classes in a business school. Though, a small study (one school), I think it posed some interesting considerations. It was interesting to see that professors had such varied thoughts about how ethics should be included in business classes and the effectiveness of those approaches. I also thought it was interesting that the study raised concerns about how business schools would be willing and able to staff and fit ethics into the curriculum. Do business schools consider ethical teaching a priority? The study suggests using a pretest/postest to measure students learning outcomes in ethical education. However, a written test may not be the best method for understanding how students would deal with a real-life ethical dilemma. As we have been learning, ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility are so important to the viability of a company. I think that this course has been helpful. Hopefully, we will see ethical preparation becoming more of a visible priority in undergrad and graduate programs across the country!
Thanks for the link about how poverty contributes to world hunger. I was reading some similar information at: http://www.concernusa.org/gcc/media/pdf/Hunger.pdf which discusses how war and conflict, weather and climate change, lack of agricultural infrastructure, poor farming practices, poverty, and population growth all play a role. I think that the bottom line is that it will take passion from strong, committed, and humble ethical leaders to help gain a more universal and global investment in finding positive solutions that benefit the common good.
Rachel, When I read the Cons my I think my heart stopped, but I know for a fact that my jaw was on the keyboard. I’m absolutely speechless!
ReplyDelete“Alleviating hunger may actually do more harm than good long term:
• Will reduce death rate, increasing population, further increasing food demand
• Allowing population growth in poor countries to exceed that of affluent countries will result in more hunger problems
• Higher population growth in marginal areas will lead to further environmental degradation
•Donating food will negatively impact domestic markets by causing local vendors to decrease prices/revenue due to competition. Decreased incentives for output will decrease food access.
•Hunger is morally acceptable, because survival of the fittest is a law of nature
•Donated aid often does not reach intended recipients or find its way to the neediest people”
These are all reasons to let people continue to starve…really??? I need a moment to process…